Archives

Disabled Innovators & Innovations

Leave a comment

Disability culture, disability innovation, and DIY efforts have long been an important part of the work that disabled leaders and resesearch values, studies, and contributes to. Over the last year, we’ve been exploring this through a couple of perspectives:

First, we’ve been developing A11yhood.org, a website that automates the collection of open source accessibility solutions across a wide variety of media from 3D printing to knitting to software, and supports search and exploration. We searched for words like “accessibility” and found over 1440 repositories/things. This project was recently launched at the Open Source and Accessibility Summit and is supported by the GitHub Tides Foundation, NIDILRR’s RERC program (90REGE0026) and in collaboration with other open-source and accessibility focused organizations and leaders including GitHub’s Ed Summers, CAOS and GOAT.

Next, we have been talking to disabled innovators. We presented a paper at ASSETS 2025 that highlights cultural processes of finding community and building solidarity, valuing disabled agency and knowledge, and rejecting ableist norms. To see how these cultural aspects might inform accessibility technology design, we studied accessibility technologies made by disabled people for disabled people – interviewing disabled innovators who had created and disseminated accessibility technologies. We asked these innovators to share their stories and reflect on goals and values they imbued in their innovations. We analyzed how cultural themes of belonging, knowledge, and creativity influenced their work. Our work highlights the potential of a cultural lens in aligning accessibility technology with disabled people’s values as well as unearthing new directions for inquiry for the field: Exploring Disability Culture Through Accounts of Disabled Innovators of Accessibility Technology, by Aashaka Desai, Jennifer Mankoff, Richard E. Ladner
(ASSETS ’25)

Embroidering Tactile Graphics

Leave a comment

Beyond Beautiful: Embroidering Legible and Expressive Tactile Graphics:
Margaret Ellen Seehorn, Claris Winston, Bo Liu, Gene S-H Kim, Emily White, Nupur Gorkar, Kate S Glazko, Aashaka Desai, Jerry Cao, Megan Hofmann, Jennifer Mankoff. ASSETS 2025

Tactile graphics present visual information to blind and visually-impaired individuals in an accessible way, through touch. Current methods for producing tactile graphics, such as embossing or swell-paper printing, have limitations such as durability – and the tools required to produce them are limited in expressiveness. In this project, we explore embroidery as a medium for producing tactile graphics. Embroidery, traditionally known for its variety and visual beauty, offers not just improved durability and ease of production – but the ability to convey information through a broad range of stitch types. Following an exploration of the design space of embroidered tactile graphics, we identify key perceptual properties that impact how embroidered textures are differentiated. Based on these differences, we introduce an optimization algorithm for assigning textures to regions of tactile graphics in a way that makes them diverse and legible. We implement an end-to-end pipeline for producing embroidered tactile graphics and evaluate the comprehensibility and legibility of our design with 6 blind participants. Our findings showed that embroidered tactile graphics present information accurately and comprehensively, and that measurable properties, such as the use of spacing and distinctiveness, were an important factor of expressive and legible design.

Photograph of two embroidered graphics. On the left is a map, with filled areas for sidewalks and buildings, with different textures indicating which is which. Braille is visible along the top. On the right is a diagram of layers of Saturn, shaped like a pie slice with different textures for the central are, middle, and outer area of the slice, each labeled.

Toward Language Justice

Leave a comment

Aashaka Desai, Rahaf Alharbi, Stacy Hsueh, Richard E. Ladner, and Jennifer Mankoff. 2025. Toward Language Justice: Exploring Multilingual Captioning for Accessibility. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’25), April 26–May 01, 2025, Yokohama, Japan. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 18 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3706598.3713622

A growing body of research investigates how to make captioning experiences more accessible and enjoyable to disabled people. However, prior work has focused largely on English captioning, neglecting the majority of people who are multilingual (i.e., understand or express themselves in more than one language). To address this gap, we conducted semi-structured interviews and diary logs with 13 participants who used multilingual captions for accessibility. Our findings highlight the linguistic and cultural dimensions of captioning, detailing how language features (scripts and orthography) and the inclusion/negation of cultural context shape the accessibility of captions. Despite lack of quality and availability, participants emphasized the importance of multilingual captioning to learn a new language, build community, and preserve cultural heritage. Moving toward a future where all ways of communicating are celebrated, we present ways to orient captioning research to a language justice agenda that decenters English and engages with varied levels of fluency.

A Multi-StakeholderAnalysis of Accessibility in Higher Education

Leave a comment

People with disabilities face extra hardship in institutions of higher education because of accessibility barriers built into the educational system. While prior work investigates the needs of individual stakeholders, this work ofers insights into the communication and collaboration between key stakeholders in creating access in institutions of higher education. The authors present refectionsfrom their experiences working with disability service ofces to meet their access needs and the results from interviewing 6 professors and 6 other disabled students about their experience in achieving access. Our results indicate that there are rich opportunities for technological solutions to support these stakeholders in communicating about and creating access

Kelly Avery Mack, Natasha A Sidik, Aashaka Desai, Emma J. McDonnell, Kunal Mehta, Christina Zhang, Jennifer Mankoff: Maintaining the Accessibility Ecosystem: a Multi-Stakeholder Analysis of Accessibility in Higher Education. ASSETS 2023: 100:1-100:6

Generative Artificial Intelligence’s Utility for Accessibility

Leave a comment

With the recent rapid rise in Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) tools, it is imperative that we understand their impact on people with disabilities, both positive and negative. However, although we know that AI in general poses both risks and opportunities for people with disabilities, little is known specifically about GAI in particular.

To address this, we conducted a three-month autoethnography of our use of GAI to meet personal and professional needs as a team of researchers with and without disabilities. Our findings demonstrate a wide variety of potential accessibility-related uses for GAI while also highlighting concerns around verifiability, training data, ableism, and false promises.

Glazko, K. S., Yamagami, M., Desai, A., Mack, K. A., Potluri, V., Xu, X., & Mankoff, J. An Autoethnographic Case Study of Generative Artificial Intelligence’s Utility for Accessibility. ASSETS 2023. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3597638.3614548

News: Can AI help boost accessibility? These researchers tested it for themselves

Presentation (starts at about 20mins)

https://youtube.com/watch?v=S40-jPBH820%3Fsi%3DCm17oTaMaDnoQGvK%3F%23t%3D20m26s

Race, Disability and Accessibility Technology

Leave a comment

Working at the Intersection of Race, Disability, and Accessibility

This paper asks how research in accessibility can do a better job of including all disabled person, rather than separating disability from a person’s race and ethnicity. Most of the accessibility research that was published in the past does not mention race, or treats it as a simple label rather than asking how it impacts disability experiences. This eliminates whole areas of need and vital perspectives from the work we do.

We present a series of case studies exploring positive examples of work that looks more deeply at this intersection and reflect on teaching at the intersection of race, disability, and technology. This paper highlights the value of considering how constructs of race and disability work alongside each other within accessibility research studies, designs of socio-technical systems, and education. Our analysis provides recommendations towards establishing this research direction.

Christina N. Harrington, Aashaka Desai, Aaleyah Lewis, Sanika Moharana, Anne Spencer Ross, Jennifer Mankoff: Working at the Intersection of Race, Disability and Accessibility. ASSETS 2023: 26:1-26:18 (pdf)

https://youtube.com/watch?v=qRMYjdSTnZs%3Fsi%3D0yhLkUyGKu-WO4Na

The Role of Speechreading in Online d/DHH Communication Accessibility

Leave a comment

Speechreading is the art of using visual and contextual cues in the environment to support listening. Often used by d/Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing (d/DHH) individuals, it highlights nuances of rich communication. However, lived experiences of speechreaders are underdocumented in the literature, and the impact of online environment and interaction of captioning with speechreading has not been explored. To bridge these gaps, we conducted a three-part study consisting of formative interviews, design probes and design sessions with 12 d/DHH individuals who speechread.